Wanted: Workshops For Journalists To Understand Technical Language So They Can Write About Science More And Intelligently!


We need Italians to tell us what we Filipinos need!?

Above: A foreign journal has just published the results of a study with Manila respondents, “Challenges Of Communicating Science: Perspectives From The Philippines[1]” (Journal Of Science Communication, vol 19, issue 01, 2020, 21 pages), published by MediaLab of Italy. The authors, Kamila Navarro and Merryn McKinnon, conducted an online survey and semi-structured, investigative interviews, “to examine the challenges faced by local scientists and science communicators when publicly communicating science in the Philippines.”

And there, right at the conceptual stage of the study, lies the problem!

In case you did not notice, I repeat… “scientists and science communicators when publicly communicating science in the Philippines.” Those scientists and communicators are in the academic and research institutions – they are notmedia people. They are communicating hard science – they are not popularizing it!  ( (superimposed image from me)

We need to popularize science.

Since I am both a science writer and science editor, I’m interested in transforming technical language into popular language, so that the layman can understand and maybe apply what scientists have found in studies. This is notthe subject of the study reported, so the results are not relevant to me.

Even the University of the Philippines Los Baños where we find the College of Development Communication, DevCom, has not been conducting studies on how hard science, in the jargon of scientists, can be made attractive reading matter for the general public. I don’t know what DevCom has been doing all these years in terms of communicating science to the people, aside from conducting their own studies.

The researchers say, “Early records of science and technology stories in Philippine print and broadcast media are scarce.” Even now, I can tell you that they are scarce – probably all technical papers published in technical journals are not transformed into popular articles the public can appreciate and apply.

Their (respondents’) answers revealed issues which have been echoed in other international studies. However, challenges of accessibility and local attitudes to science were magnified within the Philippine context.

“Magnified within the Philippine context”? I doubt it. Scientific papers are the same throughout the world – very hard to bite into by ordinary molars (mortals)!

The problem in the Philippines, as well as in other countries,  is that there are no courses or even workshops that help communicators and journalists understand technical language so that they can intelligently write about what they read.

Yes, as the authors observe, PH media maintain science sections like Health or Technology, but these appear only once or twice a week.

Even Agriculture Monthly[2], a dedicated magazine published by Manila Bulletin, does not follow up findings in aggie research to translate into popular language. No, there is no PH publication reporting on the latest science for people to appreciate and apply in their lives.

Hmmm. I can be the one-man band writer, editor & layout artist of a science magazine if anyone has publishing funds. Email me: frankahilario@gmail.com@517

 


[1]https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/19/01/JCOM_1901_2020_A03?fbclid=IwAR07iCsClh1MrtJBhBe83Q7GF5AEq-zO8Kok-6JV8bR2jFMele8MNmFxS3QArticle

[2]https://www.agriculture.com.ph/


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How PH’s Hybrid Rice Companies Can Increase Their Sales – But Do Farmers Have To Spray All Those Pesticides!?

Image
First, let me be clear: I am in favor of hybrid rice as a good part of the solution for the Philippines to attain rice self-sufficiency – I hope this year, 2021. I have already written about it; try “How Good Are Hybrid Rices In The Philippines [1] ?” (06 January 2021, BraveNewWorld@PH ) Today, Sunday, 10 January 2021, browsing on Facebook, I notice that the hybrid rice companies in my country are not minding their own business! I mean, they are not actively assisting the farmers taking care of their plantings. I found that out when on Facebook, I scanned the page “Usapang Hybrid Rice” (Talking Hybrid Rice), “Group by Tatang Juan” (above, top image). At this Facebook page, I read the entries and noticed that the farmers’ questions, answers and comments seemed innocent – but they were not. It has something to do with this: The hybrid rice companies in the Philippines are not providing adequate advice and information to farmers. And that is not good – it may even be dangerous. Her
Read more

“Healthy Foods Come From Healthy Farms” – Frank A Hilario

Image
Food crops destroyed by floods, forests destroyed by fires – what other signs do you want from the Heavens Above? God! “Good comes from Good” says Webstaurant Store – only healthy farming can bring healthy fields and homes! (“Good Comes” image from webstaurantstore.com , “Whatever good” from brainyquote.com ) “Climate Change“ is forcing us to redefine “Primate Change“ and I, Agriculturist and writer engaged in what today I call “Communication for Village Development in the 21st Century” (CoViD21) in the last 42 years – now preach Regenerative Agriculture (RA) in the villages. Primates, only RA will save us from climate change! That is a CoViD21 action/reaction from my BSA Ag Edu, UP Los Baños, 1965 and continuing self-study with the advent of the Internet in PH in 1991. Wide thoughts come from wide reading. Here now is my considered definition: Regenerative Agriculture is any principle, process, procedure, or practice applied that repeatedly returns, revives, resuscitates, o
Read more

01, Less Is More – How PhilRice Can Reduce A Rice Farmer’s Total Expenses By 51%!

Image
This essay arose from several Facebook comments on my earlier essay “07, The More The Merrier – P 1B From DA Supportive Of 10 Bataan Model Farms Leading PH Agriculture [1] ” (21 February 2021, BrainScapes ). This is my comment in that essay that readers mainly commented on: I don’t know why, but 60-year old foreign-funded IRRI and 35-year-old PH-funded PhilRice have advocated neither high-value crops (HVCs) after rice nor fertigation, when these technologies are not that new. Joy Duldulao said: “ PhilRice advocates HVCs thru its Palayamanan and FutureRice programs.” Eufemio Rasco replied: “ PhilRice should not limit itself to advocacy. Advocacy is for those who don’t have the resources. Show by example how the challenge of scaling up can be done in its own farms! Mainstream Palayamanan!” Roberto Acosta said: “ Joy Duldulao, maybe it’s high time to change the success measurement matrix of PhilRice – from increasing rice yield to increasing rice farmers' income and better lives
Read more